Firm size and productivity differential: theory and evidence from a panel of US firms

By Rajeev Dhawan. 2001

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The effects of regional capital subsidies on firm performance: an empirical study (2004, background): “make them more efficient than large firms, but that is achieved at the cost of increasing risk (Dhawan, 2001).”
Acquisitions by emerging market multinationals: Implications for firm performance (2014, methodology): “This operationalization is commonly used in the literature (Dhawan, 2001).”
Causality Between High-Performance Work Systems and Organizational Performance (2017, background): “Economists argue for the importance of productivity measures for assessing the performance of both firms (Dhawan, 2001) and the economy as a whole (Zhu, 2012).”
Succeeding in innovation: key insights on the role of R&D and technological acquisition drawn from company data (2014, unknown): “In turn, this should lead innovative small companies to favour innovation adoption through TA, rather than by promoting new products based on large-scale R&D investment where the disadvantages discussed above are much more obvious (see Pavitt 1984; Dhawan 2001).”