L2 Acquisition of Spanish DPs: the status of grammatical features.

By J. Garavito, Lydia White. 2000

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a80c4fe67199e31b82346bf7907fea0c97cdbc6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish (2004, background): “Bruhn de Garavito and White (2002) show that problems similar to those reported by Hawkins (1998, 2001) for English speakers also occur in the acquisition of Spanish by French speakers, both languages with gender, which suggests that the absence of gender in the L1 is not the only factor affecting…”
MORPHOLOGICAL ERRORS IN SPANISH SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND HERITAGE SPEAKERS (2011, result): “(p. 129) Bruhn de Garavito and White ( 2003 ) investigated the SLA of gender in Spanish by French-speaking learners and compared their results with those of Hawkins’s ( 2001 ) English-speaking learners of L2 French.”
The role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch (2011, background): “As Bruhn de Garavito and White (2000) point out, however, there is no way of”
Clitics and Determiners in L2 Greek (2003, background): “…and give rise to differential patterns of development compared to interpretable features which are grammaticalised in the L2 but not in the L1 or set to a different value in L1 and L2 (cf. White 1989, Bruhn de Garavito & White 2000, Schwartz & Sprouse 1996, Vainikka & Young-Scholten 1996, a.o.).”
Acquisition of Spanish Gender Agreement in Two Learning Contexts: Study Abroad and At Home (2010, unknown): “When L2 learners are unsure of the appropriate morphological marker, they tend to ‘‘resort to default gender marking [masculine]’’ (Bruhn de Garavito & White, 2002, p. 172; see also Harris, 1991) and they tend to overgeneralize the masculine forms more often than they do the feminine ones…”