The Link between Leadership and Followership: How Affirming Social Identity Translates Vision into Action

By S. A. Haslam, M. Platow. 2001

281 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/193d1aeefa39b1dbc083307cc26636b923e6e178

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Anti-Norm and Pro-Norm Deviance in the Bank and on the Campus: Two Experiments on Subjective Group Dynamics (2002, background): “…E A R C H on group deviance has traditionally focused on members whose behavior or characteristics reduce the group’s cohesiveness or distinctiveness, threaten its goals, or contradict its stereotype (e.g. Haslam & Platow, 2001; Hewstone & Lord, 1998; Jones & DeCharms, 1957; Kunda & Oleson, 1997).”
The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments (2012, background): “…OF LEADERSHIP 263 D ow nl oa de d by [ U ni ve rs ity L ib ra ry U tr ec ht ] at 0 8: 56 1 2 M ar ch 2 01 5 addition, empirical articles started to appear that more generally examined the role of social identity processes in leadership (e.g., Haslam & Platow, 2001a; Platow & van Knippenberg, 2001).”
Revisiting followership through a social identity perspective: the role of collective follower emotion and action (2013, background): “Likewise, Haslam and Platow (2001) found that followers' support for their leader is strongest when leaders chose to reward followers who oppose an outgroup and, by doing so, effectively indicate that they affirm and support their own group's welfare and identity.”
Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions (2008, background): “…much conceptual ground, including notions of followership and follower attitudes and behaviors based on shared identification with the leader (Haslam & Platow, 2001a, 2001b; Reicher, Haslam, & Hopkins, 2005; van Dick, Hirst, Grojean, & Wieseke, 2007), examinations of leader–member exchange…”
License to fail? How leader group prototypicality moderates the effects of leader performance on perceptions of leadership effectiveness (2008, background): “Recently, the social identity approach has been used to explain leadership processes (Duck & Fielding, 1999; Haslam & Platow, 2001; Hogg, 2001; Hogg & van Knippenberg, 2003; Pierro, Cicero, Bonaiuto, van Knippenberg, & Kruglanski, 2005; Platow, Haslam, Foddy, & Grace, 2003; Reicher & Hopkins, 2003;…”
A SOCIAL IDENTITY MODEL OF LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS IN ORGANIZATIONS (2003, background): “…extent to which the leader has a committed attitude towards the group (De Cremer & Van Vugt, 2002); is ingroup-favoring in distributive decisions (Haslam & Platow, 2001b; Platow, Hoar, Reid, Harley & Morrison, 1997; Platow, Mills & Morrison, 2000; Platow & van Knippenberg, 2001) and procedural…”
Advancing the social identity theory of leadership: A meta-analytic review of leader group prototypicality (2020, background): “An important element in group members’ willingness to follow a leader and be open to the leader’s influence is the expectation that the leader acts with the group’s best interest in mind—and is “doing it for us” (Haslam & Platow, 2001).”
Identity leadership going global: Validation of the Identity Leadership Inventory across 20 countries (2018, background): “…in a range of experimental studies in which the manipulation of identity leadership allows for causal inferences to be drawn about its impact on followers (e.g., Haslam & Platow, 2001; Platow, van Knippenberg, Haslam, van Knippenberg, & Spears, 2006; Reicher et al., 2005; Steffens et al., 2013).”