How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory
By Stephanie M. Carlson, L. J. Moses, C. Breton. 2002
827 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1924f14233ac7955ea43a2e84d5b80d81a2fbc11
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Jean Decety
- Philip L. Jackson
- Andrew N. Meltzoff
- Jessica A. Sommerville
- Peter Carruthers
- C. D. Wolfe
- M. Bell
- Sylvain Moreno
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Jean Decety
- Stephanie M. Carlson
- Peter Carruthers
- T. Ruffman
- Philip L. Jackson
- Andrew N. Meltzoff
- M. Rothbart
- Purificación Checa
Citations in the corpus
- Executive function and theory of mind (2008, neutral): “Previous studies only compared a limited number of EF domains (such as inhibition and working memory) with a limited number of tests of ToM (Carlson et al., 2002; Carlson et al., 2004; Carlson et al., 2004).”
- Mindreading in Infancy (2013, background): “…is also consistent with the repeated finding that both language ability and executive function correlate with, and are predictive of, performance in verbal false-belief tasks (Astington and Jenkins, 1999; Carlson et al., 2002, 2004; Kloo and Perner, 2003; Milligan et al., 2007; Kovács, 2009).”
- How language does (and does not) relate to theory of mind: A longitudinal study of syntax, semantics, working memory and false belief (2005, background): “Such findings are thus consistent with an expression rather than an emergence account of false belief (Carlson et al., 2002).”
- Executive Function and False-Belief Understanding in Preschool Children: Two Tasks Are Harder Than One (2003, methodology): “The working assumption of the research reported here is consistent with the findings of Carlson and colleagues (Carlson & Moses, 2001; Carlson et al., 2002).”
- Sources of variability in working memory in early childhood: A consideration of age, temperament, language, and brain electrical activity (2007, methodology): “The second " warm-up " task was a simplified version of the traditional Simon-says game and closely followed the Bear/Dragon procedure described by Carlson et al (2002; adopted from Reed, Pien, & Rothbart, 1984) except a pig puppet and a bull puppet were used.”
- Developmentally Sensitive Measures of Executive Function in Preschool Children (2005, background): “Previous research suggested that these task demands are dissociable (e.g., Carlson et al., 2002; Diamond, Kirkham, & Amso, 2002; Espy & Bull, this issue; Hughes, 1998).”
- The neural bases of cooperation and competition: an fMRI investigation (2004, background): “In addition, developmental research shows that executive control is an enabling factor for children succeeding on various theory of mind tasks (Carlson et al., 2002; Cole and Mitchell, 2000; Ozonoff et al., 1991).”
- Executive function and theory of mind: stability and prediction from ages 2 to 3. (2004, methodology): “related to EF measures involving both inhibition and working memory (Carlson et al., 2002; Hala et al., 2003).”