Action Design Research

By Maung Kyaw Sein, Ola Henfridsson, Sandeep Purao, Matti Rossi, Rikard Lindgren. MIS Q., 2011

2,047 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/309d493c4d9979b05b5bde925e0d96d30e32020c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Big Data Research in Information Systems: Toward an Inclusive Research Agenda (2016, methodology): “Given the dynamic and nascent technological and organizational environments related to big data, it would be interesting to see if (and how) one could productively use the action design research (ADR) method to develop robust big data IT artifacts (Sein et al., 2011).”
Research Perspectives: The Anatomy of a Design Principle (2020, methodology): “…& Pries-Heje, 2010; Niehaves & Ortbach, 2016), which emphasizes design features and their effect on the environment; and (5) action design research (Sein, et al., 2011), which combines action research and design research and views design as a situated process that occurs in an organizational…”
Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research (2012, background): “There is a growing interest in the IS community on how to combine AR and DR (e.g. Cole et al , 2005; Ja¨rvinen, 2007; Iivari & Venable, 2009; Sein et al , 2011).”
The digital platform: a research agenda (2018, background): “Action design research (Sein et al., 2011) provides a promising approach to such highly situated multi-actor design settings but has not been applied to digital platforms.”
A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple Perspectives (2012, positive): “…as Sein et al. define it, is exactly our general activity (3) above: “These outcomes [from artifact implementation] can be characterized as design principles [ISDT] and with further reflection, as refinements to theories that contributed to the initial design [DREPT]” (Sein et al., 2011, p. 44).”
A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research (2012, neutral): “Sein et al [12] use evaluation formatively in early (alpha) Building, Intervention, and Evaluation (BIE) cycles (cf. ex ante evaluation in [11]) of their Action Design Research Methodology (ADR).”
FEDS: a Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research (2016, methodology): “…of literature within and outside DSR that identifies different methods and paradigms for how to evaluate (e.g., in Nunamaker et al, 1990/1991; March & Smith, 1995; Hevner et al, 2004; Vaishnavi & Kuechler, 2004; Venable, 2006; Peffers et al, 2008; Sein et al, 2011; Kuechler & Vaishnavi, 2012).”