Guanxi vs networking: Distinctive configurations of affect- and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese vs American managers

By Roy Y J Chua, Michael W. Morris, Paul Ingram. 2009

435 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/183b2e7c85d149a3439d654a4460e9d79f27767f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Effects of cultural ethnicity, firm size, and firm age on senior executives’ trust in their overseas business partners: Evidence from China (2011, background): “Our findings are consistent with prior evidence that cultural values and norms can affect people’s trust Journal of International Business Studies AU TH OR C OP Y behavior, even in the presence of an appropriate institutional environment (e.g., Chua et al., 2009).”
Corporate Governance in China: A Meta‐Analysis (2018, background): “Second, the key assumptions of standard corporate governance mechanisms regarding self-interested agents and goal conflicts may not hold in contexts characterized by relationship-based governance regimes (Bruce et al., 2005; Chua et al., 2009; Gomez-Mejia et al., 2005; Luen et al., 2013).”
A Missing Piece of the Puzzle: The Organizational Context in Cultural Patterns of Creativity (2010, background): “While the Chua et al. (2009) study focused on relations between network configurations and affective and cognitive trust, and Xiao and Tsui (2007) looked at the relation between structural holes and career success, an interesting questions is: what are the effects of these specific network…”
Improving generalizations from multi-country comparisons in international business research (2010, background): “Across societies, possible antecedents of trust include Hofstede’s (2001) cultural dimensions, income inequality, ethnic diversity, education, religious traditions, and other factors (e.g., Bjørnskov, 2006; Chua et al., 2009; Doney, Cannon, & Mullen, 1998).”