The Hypoxic Microenvironment Maintains Glioblastoma Stem Cells and Promotes Reprogramming towards a Cancer Stem Cell Phenotype

By John M. Heddleston, Zhizhong Li, Anita B. Hjelmeland, Jeremy N. Rich. Cell Cycle, 2009

784 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Glioblastomas are highly lethal cancers that contain cellular hierarchies with self-renewing cancer stem cells that can propagate tumors in secondary transplant assays. The potential significance of cancer stem cells in cancer biology has been demonstrated by studies showing contributions to therapeutic resistance, angiogenesis, and tumor dispersal. We recently reported that physiologic oxygen levels differentially induce hypoxia inducible factor-2α (HIF2α) levels in cancer stem cells. HIF1α functioned in proliferation and survival of all cancer cells but also was activated in normal neural progenitors suggesting a potentially restricted therapeutic index while HIF2α was essential in only in cancer stem cells and was not expressed by normal neural progenitors demonstrating HIF2α is a cancer stem cell specific target. We now extend these studies to examine the role of hypoxia in regulating tumor cell plasticity. We find that hypoxia promotes the self-renewal capability of the stem and non-stem population as well as promoting a more stem-like phenotype in the non-stem population with increased neurosphere formation as well as upregulation of important stem cell factors, such as OCT4, NANOG, and c-MYC. The importance of HIF2α was further supported as forced expression of non-degradable HIF2α induced a cancer stem cell marker and augmented the tumorigenic potential of the non-stem population. This novel finding may indicate a specific role of HIF2α in promoting glioma tumorigenesis. The unexpected plasticity of the non-stem glioma population and the stem-like phenotype emphasizes the importance of developing therapeutic strategies targeting the microenvironmental influence on the tumor in addition to cancer stem cells.

Subfields: Cancer Research, Genetics, Oncology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/181b165460b8e01d2dad252fdaa1e9b978e2bccb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cancer Research

  1. J. Chiche
  2. Jane E. Visvader
  3. G. Lindeman
  4. M. Brahimi-Horn
  5. J. Lathia
  6. Jeremy N. Rich
  7. J. Pouysségur
  8. Giovanni Parmigiani

In Genetics

  1. Jane E. Visvader
  2. G. Lindeman
  3. J. Lathia
  4. Jeremy N. Rich
  5. Rachel Karchin
  6. J. Pouysségur
  7. Giovanni Parmigiani

In Oncology

  1. Jane E. Visvader
  2. G. Lindeman
  3. J. Lathia
  4. Jeremy N. Rich
  5. J. Pouysségur
  6. R. Weinberg
  7. Zena Werb

Citations in the corpus