Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Sport: Relationships with Leadership, Team Cohesion, and Athlete Satisfaction

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Culture Change in Elite Sport Performance Teams: Examining and Advancing Effectiveness in the New Era (2012, background): “As sport psychology does not offer comprehensive, ecologically-valid knowledge upon which practitioners can base their work, where else might guidance be sought? Reflecting previous reciprocal knowledge transfer (Ayoagi, Cox, & McGuire, 2008 ; Fletcher, 2010 ; Fletcher & Wagstaff, 2009 ), and pra”
Organizational psychology in elite sport: Its emergence, application and future (2009, background): “In Aoyagi et al.’s (2008) study, athletes from U.”
Positive Organizational Psychology in Sport: An Ethnography of Organizational Functioning in a National Sport Organization (2012, background): “In line with the search for such positive outcomes, an increasing amount of attention has also been given to prosocial behaviors (McNeely & Meligno, 1994), also referred to organizational citizenship behaviors (see Aoyagi et al., 2008), in organizations.”
The influence of coaches’ leadership styles on athletes’ satisfaction and team cohesion: A meta-analytic approach (2016, methodology): “This finding indicates that more active engagement and interpersonal communication from coaches in diverse training circumstances could help their teams become a more cohesive unit.(19,34,44) In general, a coach ought to have the ability to balance these leadership behaviors, but be able to place ad”