What Is the Relationship Between Justice and Morality

By Robert Folger, Russell S. Cropanzano, Barry M. Goldman. 2005

297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16b05b286af73af715804efca92d742712716db5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Law

1. Brent A. Scott
2. Jean‐Pascal Gond
3. Rebecca L. Greenbaum
4. David M. Mayer
5. D. Rupp
6. J. Colquitt

Citations in the corpus

• Escaping bullying: The simultaneous impact of individual and unit-level bullying on turnover intentions (2012, background): “We draw our theoretical arguments for the simultaneous and moderating impact of unit-level bullying on individual turnover intentions from the deontic model of justice and we characterize bullying as a violation of moral norms that can trigger deontic reactions (Folger, 1998, 2001; Folger et al., 20”
• Abusive Supervision and Employee Deviance: A Multifoci Justice Perspective (2017, unknown): “According to fairness theory (Folger and Cropanzano 2001; Folger et al. 2005), individuals perceive injustice from an accountable party if the party violates normative rules and intends to harm the other party.”
• Bridging corporate social responsibility and compassion at work (2014, background): “Employee perceptions of CSR and organizational justice CSR and organizational justice have a commonality in that both concepts represent a fundamental ethical assumption of normative treatment (Folger et al., 2005).”
• Elevation at work: The effects of leaders’ moral excellence (2010, unknown): “Furthermore, several authors have argued for the consideration of emotions as mediators between perceptions of both fairness and leadership and organizational outcomes (e.g., Breugelmans & De Cremer, 2007; De Cremer, 2006; Folger et al., 2005; Greenberg & Ganegoda, 2007; Zerbe & Härtel, 2000).”
• Hostility, job attitudes, and workplace deviance: test of a multilevel model. (2006, background): “Bies (1987) described these feelings as “moral outrage” (p. 290), and Folger, Cropanzano, and Goldman (2005) discussed these feelings as a “deontic response,” that is, an obligatory response to some event (p. 216).”
• The Effects of Online Incivility and Consumer-to-Consumer Interactional Justice on Complainants, Observers, and Service Providers during Social Media Service Recovery (2018, background): “…among employees tend to make negative generalizations of the firm itself (Porath, MacInnis, and Folkes 2010) and are likely to form fairness judgments of the organization due to its violation of deontic or moral expectations (Folger, Cropanzano, and Goldman 2005; Porath, MacInnis, and Folkes 2011).”