Orchestrating Innovation Networks

By C. Dhanaraj, Arvind Parkhe. 2006

1,746 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1618eb87cbd6fc655252f85fcc17b84b2e1db7d3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Clarifying the Effects of R&D on Performance: Evidence from the High Technology Industries (2011, background): “Numerous studies also confirmed that the (dis)advantages of firms are often linked to the (dis)advantage of the firm’s idiosyncratic assets (e.g. Dhanaraj and Parkhe, 2006).”
Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector (2009, background): “For example, Pittaway et al. [44] found that ‘science partners’ play an important role as independent network brokers and intermediaries, and Dhanaraj and Parkhe [45] talk about a ‘hub firm’ fulfilling such a role in ‘orchestrating’ innovation networks.”
The Internationalization of Corporate R&D: A Review of the Evidence and Some Policy Implications for Home Countries1 (2009, background): “Some of these relationships are equity based, some are contractual, while others might be purely cooperative (Dhanaraj & Parkhe, 2006; Doz, Santos, & Williamson, 2001; Dunning & Lundan, 2008b).”
Location, Control and Innovation in Knowledge-Intensive Industries (2008, background): “Coordination across organizational boundaries and orchestration of the entire network is particularly important to the success of modularization (Dhanaraj and Parkhe, 2006).”
Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem (2008, background): “Similar to biological ecosystems, business ecosystems are not homogenous and consist of participants that co-evolve, exhibit strong and weak ties, take on central and peripheral position, and transcend traditional industry and supply chain boundaries [33].”
Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World (2012, background): “…several decades, scholars of organizational science have noted that the reduction of communication and coordination cost as a result of information technology has led to a geographical dispersion of innovation activities (Dhanaraj and Parkhe 2006, Gupta et al. 2007, Maznevski and Chudoba 2000).”
Maneuvering in poor visibility : How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high (2017, background): “Users may print, download, or email articles for individual use only. by established innovation ecosystems (e.g., Dhanaraj & Parkhe, 2006; Nambisan & Sawhney, 2011; Wareham, Fox, & Cano Giner, 2014), much less work has addressed how prospective ecosystem stakeholders commit resources toward a de…”