Psychological models for the development of mathematical understanding: rational numbers and functions
By R. Case, M. Kalchman, Joan Moss. 2001
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/161889c6dfaadfda26a3834342354b52198ab433
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- K. Koedinger
- Vincent A. W. M. M. Aleven
- M. Donovan
- John D. Bransford
- Suzanne Donovan
- Roger Azevedo
- Tamara van Gog
- Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker
Citations in the corpus
- An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. (2011, unknown): “Consistent with these predictions, Kalchman, Moss, and Case (2001) found that an instructional program that emphasized fraction magnitudes was highly effective in promoting understanding of rational numbers, including decimals and percentages as well as fractions.”
- How Students Learn: Science in the Classroom. (2005, background): “Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Brown, A.L., Bransford, J.D., Ferrara, R.A., and Campione J.C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J.H. Flavell and E.M Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognitive development volume 3 (pp. 78-166). New York: Wiley. Bruner, J. (1960). The proces”
- An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor (2002, result): “Finally, our emphasis on visual and verbal knowledge integration is consistent with other successful instructional interventions that have been fundamentally designed to help students connect visual intuitions and more formal verbal knowledge (Griffin et al., 1994; Kalchman et al., 2001).”