THE BOUNDS OF ADULT LANGUAGE ACQUISITION

By Nick C. Ellis, Nuria Sagarra. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2010

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/158c8741192601774826969ea88dfc54015e820f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Nuria Sagarra
2. K. Morgan‐Short
3. E. Marsden
4. S. Thompson
5. David Abugaber
6. Nick C. Ellis
7. D. Larsen-Freeman
8. Stefan Gries

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Nuria Sagarra
2. K. Morgan‐Short
3. E. Marsden
4. S. Thompson
5. David Abugaber
6. Nick C. Ellis
7. D. Larsen-Freeman
8. S. Montrul

Citations in the corpus

• LEARNED ATTENTION IN ADULT LANGUAGE ACQUISITION (2011, methodology): “These measures do not obligate cue competition; they are independent, permitting equivalent accuracy on both cues up to maximum of 1.0 for β and r and 12.0 for production accuracy (in Ellis & Sagarra, 2010 , this was expressed as a proportion).”
• Replication in Second Language Research: Narrative and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations for the Field. (2018, methodology): “…(1996) replicated VanPatten and Cadierno (1993a & 1993b); Liu (1985) replicated Au (1983 & 1984); Walters (2012) replicated Fitzpatrick and Meara (2004) and Fitzpatrick and Clenton (2010); and Ellis et al. (2014) replicated both Ellis and Sagarra (2010) and Ellis and Sagarra (2011, experiment 1).”