Integrating speech information across talkers, gender, and sensory modality: Female faces and male voices in the McGurk effect
By K. Green, Patricia K. Kuhl, Andrew N. Meltzoff, Erica Stevens. 1991
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Yi-Chuan Chen
- David J. Lewkowicz
- Charles Spence
- Jean H. M. Vroomen
- Argiro Vatakis
- Janet F. Werker
- Ruth Campbell
- Michelle L. Patterson
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “In addition, the congruency of stimulus identity modulates the extent to which people integrate multisensory speech stimuli (Easton and Basala, 1982; Munhall et al., 1996; though see Green et al., 1991).”
- The McGurk effect in infants. (1995, background): “integration can occur over auditory and visual signals generated by speakers of different gender ( Green, Kuhl, Meltzoff, and Stevens, 1991 ) indicating that the two information streams need not appear to emanate from the same source.”
- Visual attention modulates audiovisual speech perception (2004, unknown): “(e.g. Green, Kuhl, Meltzoff, & Stevens, 1991; McGurk & MacDonald, 1976).”
- Audio-visual speech scene analysis: characterization of the dynamics of unbinding and rebinding the McGurk effect. (2015, background): “, 2007), and even incoherence of 916 source identity, with a female face dubbed on a male voice (Green et al., 1991).”
- Multisensory integration of speech signals: the relationship between space and time (2006, unknown): “The McGurk eVect has been widely investigated (Green et al. 1991; Walker et al. 1995; Rosenblum et al. 1997; Sekiyama 1997; Hampson et al. 2003; Windmann 2004) and has served as a valuable tool for examining the integration of audiovisual speech signals.”
- The perception of emotions by ear and by eye (2000, background): “In the study by Green, Kuhl, and Meltzoff (1991) subjects were aware of the discrepancy of the gender of the face and the voice.”
- The processing of audio-visual speech: empirical and neural bases (2008, background): “The findings that phonetic context perceived by eye can shift phonemic category boundaries (Green et al. 1991), and that prelinguistic babies are sensitive to McGurk effects (Burnham & Dodd 2004), demonstrate that audio-visual integration can occur 'pre-phonemically'.”
- Audiovisual multisensory integration (2007, background): “to identify speech stimuli, at least when the observers are familiar with the speakers in the video-clips (see [48,49]; though see also [50] for null results).”
- Audio-visual speech perception is special. (2005, background): “loudness of the auditory stimuli (Rosenblum & Fowler, 1991; Grant & Seitz, 2000 ).”
- Infants' ability to match dynamic phonetic and gender information in the face and voice. (2002, background): “These results, like those reported with adults ( Green & Kuhl, 1991 ), suggest that 4.5-month-old infants are able to ignore incongruent gender information in order to match on the basis of phonetic information in face and voice.”
- Infants' perception of expressive behaviors: differentiation of multimodal information. (1997, background): “Further support for this conjecture is provided by Green et al. (1991), who paired a male face with a female voice and vice versa.”