The processing of audio-visual speech: empirical and neural bases

By Ruth Campbell. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2008

300 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Natural Statistics of Audiovisual Speech (2009, background): “Several issues, such as the type of information extracted from each modality, static versus dynamic features, and the stage of integration for visual and auditory inputs are unresolved [6,7].”
Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect. (2012, background): “The role of STS (and more precisely posterior STS) is considered crucial, particularly for processing correlations between auditory and visual stimuli, which should be a basic ingredient in audiovisual speech binding (Campbell, 2008).”
Bridging the Gap between Social Animal and Unsocial Machine: A Survey of Social Signal Processing (2012, unknown): “Recent results [40] pointed out the cognitive and neural mechanisms involved in two types of integration of voice and facial expressions: complementary and correlated.”
The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances (2013, background): “…sulcus; (Poeppel et al., 2008)], where the neural binding of syllabic auditory and visual speech seems to occur (around 150 ms after speech onset, Campbell, 2008), and then it generally takes another 100–250 ms before lexical access presumably occurs supported by neural mechanisms in the left…”