Multisensory integration of speech signals: the relationship between space and time

By Jeffery A. Jones, Michelle Jarick. 2006

63 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sensory Systems

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “By contrast, the McGurk effect seems not to be influenced by the spatial disparity between the visual and auditory stimulus (Jones and Munhall, 1997; Jones and Jarick, 2006; see Spence, 2013, for a review).”
The temporal binding window for audiovisual speech: Children are like little adults (2016, background): “Observations were restricted to visual leading asynchronies, where fusion has historically been more readily observed across a wider range of delays (e.g., Jones & Jarick, 2006; van Wassenhove et al., 2007).”
Audiovisual multisensory integration (2007, background): “, [20,52]; though see [25,29,30] for important exceptions).”
Just how important is spatial coincidence to multisensory integration? Evaluating the spatial rule (2013, unknown): “…30◦ max sep. Colin et al. (2001)83 McGurk effect No A, V Yes No c. 30◦ max sep. Fisher and Pylysyn (1994)84 McGurk effect No A, V Yes No c. 30◦ max sep. Jones and Jarick (2006)85 McGurk effect No A, V Yes No 180◦ max sep. Jones and Munhall (1997)86 McGurk effect No A, V Yes No 90◦ max…”
Perception of intersensory synchrony: A tutorial review (2010, unknown): “In fact, the delays at which auditory and visual speech streams are perceived as synchronous are extremely wide (Conrey & Pisoni, 2006; Dixon & Spitz, 1980; Jones & Jarick, 2006; Stekelenburg & Vroomen, 2007; van Was-senhove, Grant, & Poeppel, 2007; Vatakis & Spence, 2006).”
Crossmodal binding: Evaluating the “unity assumption” using audiovisual speech stimuli (2007, background): “However, it is important to note that stimulus-driven (or structural) factors, such as any fine-timescale temporal correspondence or correlation between the stimuli occurring in the two streams (see Armel & Ramachandran, 2003; Bermant & Welch, 1976; Jones & Jarick, 2006; Radeau & Bertelson, 1977, ”