Visual attention modulates audiovisual speech perception

By Kaisa Tiippana, T. Andersen, Mikko Sams. 2004

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35f1185eb1e99f84cd4f54002abb87f536766856

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Pawel J. Matusz
2. Jean-Luc Schwartz
3. Olha Nahorna
4. Frédéric Berthommier
5. Micah M. Murray
6. Emiliano Macaluso
7. Scott L. Fairhall
8. Rosanna De Meo

In Sensory Systems

1. Pawel J. Matusz
2. Micah M. Murray
3. Scott L. Fairhall
4. Emiliano Macaluso
5. Antonia Thelen
6. Charles Spence

In Social Psychology

1. William Forde Thompson
2. Olha Nahorna
3. Micah M. Murray
4. Frédéric Berthommier
5. Frank A. Russo
6. Jean-Luc Schwartz

Citations in the corpus

• Spatial attention can modulate audiovisual integration at multiple cortical and subcortical sites (2009, background): “to exhaust attentional resources demonstrate that attention can influence MI (Tiippana et al., 2004; Alsius et al., 2005, 2007).”
• Top-down control and early multisensory processes: chicken vs. egg (2015, background): “…per se (e.g., Matusz and Eimer, 2011, 2013; Matusz et al., 2015; Talsma and Woldorff, 2005; but see Murray et al., 2004; SotoFaraco et al., 2004; Tiippana et al., 2004; Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org March 2015 | Volume 9 | Article 17 | 1 INTEGRATIVE…”
• The processing of audio-visual speech: empirical and neural bases (2008, background): “But are these just a few local features, or do speech production characteristics have broader applicability to speech-reading? Yehia et al. (2002) measured the visual kinematics as well as the spectral (acoustic) properties of some spoken phrases.”
• Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect. (2012, background): “…responses to audiovisual stimuli in the McGurk paradigm), irrespective of whether the attentional load is imposed on the visual Binding and unbinding in the McGurk effect Nahorna et al. 5 (Tiippana et al., 2004), auditory (Alsius et al., 2005) or even the tactile system (Alsius et al., 2007).”
• Audio-visual speech scene analysis: characterization of the dynamics of unbinding and rebinding the McGurk effect. (2015, background): “A remarkable point in the studies by Tiippana et al. (2004) and Alsius et al. (2005) is that 129   the subjects were simultaneously processing multiple auditory or visual inputs (see also 130   Andersen et al., 2009; Alsius and Soto-Faraco, 2011).”
• Audio-visual integration of emotional cues in song (2008, background): “Recent speech perception research has revealed modulation of audiovisual integration by attention (Alsius, Navarra, Campbell, & Soto-Faraco, 2005; Tiippana, Andersen, & Sams, 2004 ).”