How Effective are the NSSE Benchmarks in Predicting Important Educational Outcomes?

288 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Student and Faculty Member Engagement in Undergraduate Research (2013, background): “Numerous studies support NSSE’s and FSSE’s reliability and validity (Kuh et al. 2002, 2004; Carini et al. 2001; Pascarella et al. 2010; Umbach and Warwynski 2005).”
An Investigation of the Contingent Relationships Between Learning Community Participation and Student Engagement (2011, background): “Studies indicate that The College Student Report meets these five criteria and yields accurate, meaningful information about students’ college experiences (Kuh 2001b; Kuh et al. 2001; Ouimet et al. 2004; Pascarella et al. 2010 ).”
Impacts of Experiential Learning Depth and Breadth on Student Outcomes (2017, background): “First, although the NSSE is a widely used instrument with verified correlation to direct measures of learning (Pascarella et al., 2010), it is still an indirect measure.”
Does Involvement Really Matter? Indicators of College Student Success and Satisfaction (2013, methodology): “…that “NSSE results regarding educational practices and student experiences are good proxy measures for growth in important educational outcomes” (Pascarella et al., 2010, p. 21). participants Responses from the spring 2008 administration of the NSSE at one research-extensive US university in…”