An assessment battery for identifying language impairment in African American children.

By H. Craig, J. Washington. 2000

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Speech & Audio

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. McDonald
2. J. Oetting
3. H. Craig
4. J. Washington
5. Sharad Goel
6. Dan Jurafsky

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. J. McDonald
2. J. Oetting
3. H. Craig
4. J. Washington
5. Dan Jurafsky
6. Holger Hopp
7. Walt Wolfram
8. Janneke Van Hofwegen

In Speech & Audio

1. J. McDonald
2. J. Oetting
3. H. Craig
4. J. Washington
5. Dan Jurafsky

Citations in the corpus

• Racial disparities in automated speech recognition (2020, methodology): “Most previous studies using DDMs have focused on the syntactic complexity of AAVE (34, 35).”
• Methods for characterizing participants' nonmainstream dialect use in child language research. (2002, methodology): “Washington and Craig (1998) and Craig and Washington (2000) also used this method in addition to using token method 1. A third token-based approach was used by Oetting and McDonald (2001) and Jackson and Roberts (2001).”
• Oral Language Expectations for African American Preschoolers and Kindergartners (2002, methodology): “Recently, Craig and Washington (2000) demonstrated how the non-dialectal portion of this protocol could be used to identify African American children with language impairments.”