Student Evaluations and Gendered Expectations: What We Can't Count Can Hurt Us
By J. Sprague, Kelley Massoni. 2005
189 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/145ab13d856f376b55e4dceb78d8a774d9d3dc5f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Anne Boring
- Michelle L. Ceynar
- Amani El-Alayli
- Ashley A. Hansen-Brown
- Elizabeth Davison
- Jammie Price
- Wolfgang Stroebe
In Social Psychology
- Anne Boring
- Michelle L. Ceynar
- Amani El-Alayli
- Ashley A. Hansen-Brown
- Elizabeth Davison
- Shelley J. Correll
- Jammie Price
Citations in the corpus
- How do we rate? An evaluation of online student evaluations (2009, background): “Students who want ease, niceness and entertainment cannot assess effectiveness in teaching in any reliable or valid way (Wachtel 1998 ; Sprague and Massoni 2005 ), as the true measure of effectiveness is learning.”
- Inside the Black Box of Organizational Life: The Gendered Language of Performance Assessment (2020, background): “However, Sprague and Massoni (2005) found that even when quantitative differences in student ratings are not found, students use different language to describe their best and worst women and men teachers.”
- Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching (2017, background): “While improving enthusiasm is not a time-consuming task, students’ gendered expectations may create incentives for female teachers to invest in more time-consuming dimensions of teaching, such as course preparation or more detailed feedback on homework assignments [Sprague and Massoni, 2005].”
- Contrapower Harassment in Academia: A Survey of Faculty Experience with Student Incivility, Bullying, and Sexual Attention (2009, background): “Sprague and Massoni (2005) found that students asked to recall their ‘worst-ever’ professors were more likely to use hostile and pathologizing labels for women teachers they disliked (e.g., bitch, psychotic) than men; they were also twice as likely to use the term ‘unfair’ to apply to women.”
- Dancing Backwards in High Heels: Female Professors Experience More Work Demands and Special Favor Requests, Particularly from Academically Entitled Students (2018, background): “students described their Bbest-ever^ female professors as nurturing, and their Bworst-ever^ female professors as rigid, mean, and unfair (Sprague and Massoni 2005).”