Stealing Time at Work: Attitudes, Social Pressure, and Perceived Control as Predictors of Time Theft

By Christine A. Henle, C. Reeve, Virginia E. Pitts. 2010

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The moderating effect of religiosity on ethical behavioural intentions: An application of the extended theory of planned behaviour to Pakistani bank employees (2017, methodology): “These measures, an adaptation of procedures followed, in earlier business ethics research projects (Henle et al., 2010; Ray et al., 1999; Zarkada-Fraser and Skitmore, 2000), were adopted in order to reduce social desirability bias, a common problem with this type of research (Conway and Lance,…”
When Is Empowerment Effective? The Role of Leader-Leader Exchange in Empowering Leadership, Cynicism, and Time Theft (2017, background): “organizations range from 1 hr per day (the industry standard, which is typically calculated into salaries) up to 2 hr per day (Henle et al., 2010; Martin et al., 2010).”
Sustainable Behavior in the Business Sphere (2014, unknown): “…behavior in companies (e.g., Martin-Peña et al., 2010; Tudor et al., 2008; Tudor, Barr, & Gilg, 2007) as well as ethical and moral behavior (e.g., Henle et al., 2010), and several others build on this assumption with the aim to identifying further determinants (e.g., Carpenter & Reimers, 2005;…”
The impact of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control on managers’ intentions to behave ethically (2018, background): “Contemporary researchers promote the idea to inculcate PBC as a predictor of ethical intent to bring more clarity in its impact on corporate ethics (Henle et al., 2010).”