Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach

By U. Pascual, P. Balvanera, S. Díaz, G. Pataki, E. Roth, M. Stenseke, R. Watson, E. B. Dessane, M. Islar, E. Kelemen and 38 more. 2017

1,483 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Nature is perceived and valued in starkly different and often conflicting ways. This paper presents the rationale for the inclusive valuation of nature’s contributions to people (NCP) in decision making, as well as broad methodological steps for doing so. While developed within the context of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), this approach is more widely applicable to initiatives at the knowledge–policy interface, which require a pluralistic approach to recognizing the diversity of values. We argue that transformative practices aiming at sustainable futures would benefit from embracing such diversity, which require recognizing and addressing power relationships across stakeholder groups that hold different values on human nature-relations and NCP.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb23fded489eafd5ffe4747831cb06eb853ef1e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Robert Costanza
  2. Paul C. Sutton
  3. Ida Kubiszewski
  4. R.W.J. de Groot
  5. P. Balvanera
  6. L. Braat
  7. S. Farber
  8. Werner Kissling

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Robert Costanza
  2. Paul C. Sutton
  3. Ida Kubiszewski
  4. R.W.J. de Groot
  5. L. Braat
  6. S. Farber
  7. P. Balvanera
  8. L. Fioramonti

Citations in the corpus