Subjective well-being related to satisfaction with daily travel

By C. J. Bergstad, Amelie Gamble, Tommy Gärling, Olle Hagman, Merritt Polk, Dick Ettema, M. Friman, Lars E. Olsson. 2011

341 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13119585947ae474baf58c0715d0eb9b38d21290

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Mood and mode: does how we travel affect how we feel? (2014, background): “…resources—for example, private vehicles and nearby transit service—is linked to life satisfaction and mental health (Ballas and Tranmer, 2012; Bergstad et al. 2011; Brereton et al. 2008; Ellaway et al. 2003; Macintyre et al. 2001; Macintyre et al. 1998; Morris 2013), but this is not a…”
Do satisfying walking and cycling trips result in more future trips with active travel modes? An exploratory study (2019, background): “This travel satisfaction can consequently improve life satisfaction through the performance of - and satisfaction with - activities at the destination of the trip (Bergstad et al., 2011; De Vos, 2018; De Vos, Schwanen, Van Acker, & Witlox, 2013; Ettema, G€arling, Olsson, & Friman, 2010).”
Commute happiness in Xi’an, China: Effects of commute mode, duration, and frequency (2018, methodology): “Bergstad et al. (2011) developed an alternative version of STS that adapted the Satisfaction with Life Scale measure developed by Diener et al. (1985).”
Travel and Subjective Well-Being: A Focus on Findings, Methods and Future Research Needs (2013, background): “Bergstad et al. (2011) even claim that weekly mood is affected by satisfaction with travel but the effects described in this study may not be direct; they may signify some form of accumulation of momentary experiences of repeatedly undertaken trips or activities.”
Activity-based models of travel demand: promises, progress and prospects (2014, neutral): “Other examples include the costs of parking and travelling, demand for battery stations (e.g. Knapen, Kochan, Bellemans, Janssens, & Wets, 2012), improved accessibility and social exclusion measures, wellbeing, satisfaction and quality-of-life indicators (e.g. Abou-Zeid and Ben-Akiva, 2012; Archer, ”
Travel satisfaction revisited : on the pivotal role of travel satisfaction in conceptualizing a travel behavior process (2017, background): “Some studies also suggest that travel, and satisfaction with this travel, can have an impact on long-term well-being (Bergstad et al., 2011; De Vos, 2017; De Vos et al., 2013; Ettema et al., 2010).”
Perceived urban design qualities and affective experiences of walking (2016, background): “…to conceptualize travel mode choice (Johansson 2004, 2006; Fyhri and Hjortol 2009), and it is already established that travelling by car (Jakobsson Bergstad et al. 2011), public transport (Friman 2004; Ettema et al. 2011; Eriksson, Friman, and Gärling 2013) and cycling (Westman et al. 2013) may…”
Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction: bridging the gap between decision utility and experienced utility (2016, background): “More people walking and cycling can increase overall travel satisfaction, but also satisfaction with the activity at the destination of the trip and overall well-being (Bergstad et al. 2011; Olsson et al. 2013).”
From attitude to satisfaction: introducing the travel mode choice cycle (2021, neutral): “…have instead used agreement ratings of statements, inspired by the Satisfaction with Life Scale (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Gri ﬀ en, 1985), to measure satisfaction with daily travel (Bergstad et al., 2011), and satisfaction with commuting and leisure travel (De Vos, Ettema, & Witlox, 2019b).”