Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction: bridging the gap between decision utility and experienced utility

By J. De Vos, Patricia L. Mokhtarian, Tim Schwanen, Veronique Van Acker, Frank Witlox. 2016

453 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/289d4ef693b8a251a16aa3717cc14670bc612b91

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Walking (and cycling) to well-being: Modal and other determinants of subjective well-being during the commute (2018, background): “Indeed, the attitudes and personalities of travelers seem to be more directly linked to travel well-being (De Vos et al., 2016; Ory & Mokhtarian, 2009; Steg, 2005; St-Louis et al., 2014); e.g., pro-environmental attitudes were associated with travel liking for nonautomobile modes (Ory & Mokhtarian,…”
Satisfaction with the commute: The role of travel mode choice, built environment and attitudes (2017, methodology): “De Vos et al. (2015) investigated the relationship between travel mode choice and travel satisfaction for leisure trips, using survey data (n=1,720) collected in twelve neighborhoods in the Belgian city of Ghent, they found that participants using active travel (especially walking) are most…”
Do people travel with their preferred travel mode? Analysing the extent of travel mode dissonance and its effect on travel satisfaction (2018, background): “…that travel satisfaction (i.e., experienced emotions during ‒ and cognitive evaluations of ‒ trips) is greatly affected by the chosen travel mode (e.g., De Vos et al., 2016; Legrain et al., 2015; Morris and Guerra, 2015; Páez and Whalen, 2010; St-Louis et al., 2014), only a limited amount of…”
Travel satisfaction revisited : on the pivotal role of travel satisfaction in conceptualizing a travel behavior process (2017, background): “The effect of trip characteristics − such as trip duration and travel mode choice − on travel satisfaction has been analysed quite frequently (De Vos et al., 2016; Ettema et al., 2011; Mao et al., 2016; Morris and Guerra, 2015a, 2015b; Olsson et al., 2013; St-Louis et al., 2014).”
From attitude to satisfaction: introducing the travel mode choice cycle (2021, unknown): “…mode in ﬂ uences travel satisfaction; active travel mostly results in high levels of trip satisfaction, while the use of motorised modes (especially the bus) results in relatively low satisfaction levels (e.g. De Vos et al., 2016; Morris & Guerra, 2015b; Singleton, 2019b; St-Louis et al., 2014).”
Satisfaction-induced travel behaviour (2019, methodology): “These studies found the highest levels of satisfaction for active travellers, while public transport users are generally least satisfied with their trips (e.g., De Vos et al., 2016; Morris & Guerra, 2015b; St-Louis et al., 2014; Ye & Titheridge, 2017).”
How satisfying is the Scale for Travel Satisfaction (2015, methodology): “Various studies have shown that active travel generates the highest levels of travel satisfaction, while public transport users’ experience is most negative (Abou-Zeid, 2009; De Vos et al., 2015; Duarte et al., 2010; Ettema et al., 2011; Friman et al., 2013; Olsson et al., 2013).”
Does daily commuting behavior matter to employee productivity? (2019, result): “These findings align well with recent studies on travel satisfaction (De Vos et al., 2015; Smith, 2017; St-Louis et al., 2014; Ye and Titheridge, 2017).”
Do satisfying walking and cycling trips result in more future trips with active travel modes? An exploratory study (2019, background): “However, it is also possible that travel satisfaction, and the evaluation of travel in particular, can affect (future) mode choices (Figure 1) (De Vos & Witlox, 2017; De Vos et al., 2016).”