Mainstreaming Fair Trade Coffee: From Partnership to Traceability

By Laura T. Raynolds. 2009

417 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Plant Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1264f25377b27ee77428f23e84b816f1bc2fa83e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

In Plant Science

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Who decides what is fair in fair trade? The agri-environmental governance of standards, access, and price (2010, background): “On the other end of the continuum, we find what Raynolds ( 2009 ) refers to as the ‘market driven’ buyers and Reed ( 2009 ) characterises as the 100 percent corporate Fair Trade value chain.”
Fair Trade Standards, Corporate Participation, and Social Movement Responses in the United States (2010, background): “Raynolds (2009) describes three groups: in addition to “mission-driven” and “market-driven,” she also identifies a “quality-driven” group of retailers that selectively engage with fair trade primarily to access supplies of high-quality products.”
Trust, legitimacy and power in forest certification: A case study of the FSC in British Columbia (2012, background): “Over time, however, theorists have noted a shift in certification processes from ‘‘relational’’ systems based on long-term cooperation and trust-building to more socially dis-embedded processes focused on control and surveillance (Mutersbaugh, 2005; Raynolds, 2009).”
The “Bad Labor” Footprint: Quantifying the Social Impacts of Globalization (2014, background): “Consumers and retailers alike have expressed the desire for humane working conditions in the supply chains of products [5–8].”
Transnational private governance between the logics of empowerment and control (2015, background): “…power relations in supply chains by creating knowledge networks, cutting out middlemen, and establishing direct and long-term connections between producers and consumers, thereby relocating the creation of added value (Langman 1992; Tallontire 2000; Raynolds 2002, 2009; Jaffee 2007; Schmid 2007).”
Explaining the 'hungry farmer paradox': Smallholders and fair trade cooperatives navigate seasonality and change in Nicaragua's corn and coffee markets (2014, background): “prices, improved access to credit, enjoy more social ties to outside organizations, and, in some cases, have higher levels of educational attainment (Raynolds, 2009; Méndez et al., 2010; Bacon et al., 2008; Arnould et al., 2009).”
Profits and poverty: Certification's troubled link for Nicaragua's organic and fairtrade coffee producers (2011, background): “In addition, the rising quality standards for organic and fairtrade coffee (Murray and Raynolds, 2006; Raynolds, 2009) increase production costs asmore labor is needed.”
Sustaining Inter-organizational Relationships Across Institutional Logics and Power Asymmetries: The Case of Fair Trade (2016, background): “Whilst more fine-grained analyses of the FT movement have documented the diversity of practices from both corporate retailers (Bezençon and Blili 2009; Smith 2010) and specialized fair trade organizations (FTOs) (Huybrechts 2010a, 2012), the richness of FTO-corporate relationships has been less docu”
Fair Trade/Organic Coffee, Rural Livelihoods, and the "Agrarian Question": Southern Mexican Coffee Families in Transition (2011, neutral): “, cocoa, tea, and wine), and is now just one example of a broader set of sustainability initiatives that operate outside the state and through markets (Cashore, Auld, & Newsome, 2004; Raynolds, 2009).”
The ambivalent impact of coffee certification on farmers' welfare: A matched panel approach for cooperatives in Central Kenya (2016, background): “shares) has not been substantially modified (Muradian & Pelupessy, 2005; Raynolds, 2009; Valkila, Haaparanta, & Niemi, 2010).”