A forecast of household ownership and use of alternative fuel vehicles: A multiple discrete-continuous choice approach
By Jiwoon Ahn, Gicheol Jeong, Yeonbae Kim. 2008
173 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Transportation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/11fb6b8cfbf0da000f8ebad3d514a8aba932ba08
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- André Hackbarth
- Reinhard Madlener
- Sabreena Anowar
- L. Miranda-Moreno
- L. Friedman
- Makoto Tanaka
- Naveen Eluru
- Kayo Murakami
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- André Hackbarth
- Reinhard Madlener
- L. Miranda-Moreno
- Sabreena Anowar
- L. Friedman
- Makoto Tanaka
- Naveen Eluru
- Kayo Murakami
In Transportation
- Sabreena Anowar
- L. Miranda-Moreno
- L. Friedman
- Makoto Tanaka
- Reinhard Madlener
- Naveen Eluru
- Kayo Murakami
- Takanori Ida
Citations in the corpus
- Willingness-to-Pay for Alternative Fuel Vehicle Characteristics: A Stated Choice Study for Germany (2014, background): “…Brownstone and Train, 1999; Ewing and Sarigöllü, 1998, 2000; Potoglou and Kanaroglou, 2007; Hidrue et al., 2011), Asia (e.g. Kuwano et al., 2005; Ahn et al., 2008; Dagsvik and Liu, 2009; Qian and Soopramanien, 2011; Shin et al., 2012; Ito et al., 2013), Australia (e.g. Hensher and Greene, 2006,…”
- Consumer Preferences for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Analysis (2013, background): “Our study builds on the rich body of literature on the demand for AFVs, which has been primarily carried out in the US (Beggs et al., 1981; Calfee, 1985; Bunch et al., 1993; Golob et al., 1993; Brownstone and Train, 1999; Brownstone et al., 2000; Axsen et al., 2009; Hidrue et al., 2011; Musti and Ko”
- Alternative Modeling Approaches Used for Examining Automobile Ownership: A Comprehensive Review (2014, methodology): “Recently, Ahn et al. (2008) employed conjoint analysis and employed the MDCEV framework to understand consumer preferences for alternative fuel vehicles. In another study, Bhat et al. (2009) extended the MDCEV formulation to the joint nested MDCEV–MNL model Alternative Modeling Approaches Used for E”
- Individual characteristics and stated preferences for alternative energy sources and propulsion technologies in vehicles (2012, unknown): “…choice analyses are based on data from stated preference (SP) experiments (e.g. Bunch et al., 1993, Ewing and Sarigöllü, 1998, Brownstone and Train, 1999, Dagsvik et al., 2002, Sándor and Train, 2004, Horne et al., 2005, Potoglou and Kanaroglou, 2007, Achtnicht et al., 2008, Ahn et al., 2008).”
- Public attitudes towards and demand for hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles: A review of the evidence and methodological implications (2010, unknown): “Finally, through choice experiments, Ahn et al. (2008) investigate the preferences of 280 drivers in South Korea with regard to AFVs where factors such as vehicle usage and ownership are taken into account.”
- Consumers’ willingness to pay for alternative fuel vehicles: A comparative discrete choice analysis between the US and Japan (2014, background): “…2011), Canada (Ewing and Sarigöllü, 2000; Potoglou and Kanaroglou, 2007; Mau et al., 2008), Germany (Ziegler, 2012; Achtnicht et al., 2012; Hackbarth and Madlener, 2013), Norway (Dagsvik et al, 2002), Japan (Ito et al., 2013), South Korea (Ahn et al., 2008), and China (Qian and Soopramanien, 2011).”