Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment

1,251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Testing Measurement Invariance and Comparing Latent Factor Means Within a Confirmatory Factor Analysis Framework (2011, background): “Thus bias results from the presence of a nuisance factor that produces an undesirable source of measurement variance due to construct bias, method bias, and/or item bias (van de Vijver & Poortinga, 2005, pp. 41-49).”
Validity and Psychometric Properties of the Early Development Instrument in Canada, Australia, United States, and Jamaica (2011, methodology): “However, unlike mortality rates, the measurement of child development is influenced by culture, language and theory, and thus its concept can vary across place, culture, language and research tradition, making international comparability difficult (Hambleton et al. 2005).”
Analysis of Cross-Cultural Comparability of PISA 2009 Scores (2014, background): “For this purpose, we use the item response theory (IRT) approach in analyzing measurement equivalence, namely, the analysis of differential item functioning (DIF).”
Three Generations of DIF Analyses: Considering Where It Has Been, Where It Is Now, and Where It Is Going (2007, background): “Please see Kristjansson, Desrochers, and Zumbo (2003) and Hambleton, Merenda, and Spielberger (2006) for a discussion of developments in translation and adaptation.”