Validity and Psychometric Properties of the Early Development Instrument in Canada, Australia, United States, and Jamaica

By M. Janus, S. Brinkman, E. Duku. 2011

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91d7a61905fb0406b459d51f03ff1ef0944e9982

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. S. Brinkman
2. M. Janus

In Education

1. S. Brinkman
2. M. Janus

Citations in the corpus

• Associations Between the Early Development Instrument at Age 5, and Reading and Numeracy Skills at Ages 8, 10 and 12: a Prospective Linked Data Study (2013, background): “Studies have found the Instrument to have very good internal and test-retest reliability and external validity (Forget-Dubois et al. 2007; Guhn and Goelman 2011; Guhn et al. 2011; Janus et al. 2011; Janus and Offord 2007).”