The relationship of learning and memory with organizational performance: The moderating role of turbulence

By Sangphet Hanvanich, K. Sivakumar, G. Tomas M. Hult. 2006

284 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Internal market orientation, market capabilities and learning orientation (2014, unknown): “generative learning) (Baker and Sinkula, 1999; Hanvanich et al., 2006).”
The impact of dynamic capabilities on operational marketing and technological capabilities: investigating the role of environmental turbulence (2015, background): “Third, previous research is inconclusive regarding how technological turbulence—defined as the degree and predictability of change associated with product and process technologies in an industry (Hanvanich et al. 2006)—affects the relationship between dynamic capabilities and marketing and technolog”
How do organizations remember? The influence of organizational structure on organizational memory (2010, background): “…has been linked to improved decision-making (e.g. Markus 2001; Park and Bunn 2003; Ozorhon et al. 2005), facilitated turn-over (Yates 1989), organizational learning (Cross and Baird 2000; Fitzpatrick 2006; Hanvanich et al. 2006), and the development of innovative products (Moorman and Miner 1997).”
Organizational Learning (2012, methodology): “Table 3 presents descriptive statistics and correlations. Single-item averages were created for the multi-item scales. We normalized the organizational size variable using a logarithmic transformation. We chose multivariate general linear modeling (MGLM) to test our hypotheses. MGLM uses an iterativ”