Accurate Personality Judgment

By D. Funder. 2012

358 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0fde7b7ad6dc88eda038cbaae8c8d01eff9ad47a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Narcissistic CEOs and executive compensation (2014, background): “(Funder, 2012; Mount, Barrick, & Strauss, 1994) and that observers are able to make these assessments easily (Lievens, DeFruyt, & Van Dam, 2001).”
The Promise and Problems of Organizational Culture (2014, background): “…accumulated an impressive body of findings providing convincing evidence that (a) personality and values can be assessed with great accuracy (e.g., Funder, 2012; John, Naumann, & Soto, 2008), (b) values and personality are related to a range of important individual and life outcomes (e.g., Ozer &…”
Constructing Validity: New Developments in Creating Objective Measuring Instruments (2019, neutral): “…McDade-Montez, Watson, O’Hara, & Denburg, 2008; or children, Putnam, Rothbart, & Gartstein, 2008), concerns about valid responding (e.g., psychopathology, Achenbach, Krukowski, Dumenci, & Ivanova, 2005), and simply to provide another perspective on the person’s behavior (e.g., Funder, 2012).”
LinkedIn as a new selection method: Psychometric properties and assessment approach (2018, methodology): “According to RAM (Funder, 1995, 1999, 2012), judges’ ratings are more accurate for good targets.”
Measurement Matters: Assessing Personal Qualities Other Than Cognitive Ability for Educational Purposes (2015, background): “Individuals can carry out this kind of self-judgment and other-judgment arithmetic with admirable accuracy and precision (Funder, 2012).”
“See You in Court”: How CEO narcissism increases firms' vulnerability to lawsuits (2017, background): “Previous research has shown that the accuracy of observers' ratings of personality is higher than self-assessments (Funder, 2012; Mount, Barrick, & Strauss, 1994) and that observers are able to make these assessments easily (Lievens, DeFruyt, & Van Dam, 2001).”
Psychology Meets Machine Learning: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Algorithmic Job Candidate Screening (2018, background): “RAM states that the degree to which judgments are accurate is moderated by the following factors: good targets, good traits, good information, and finally, good judges (Funder 2012).”
Automatic personality assessment through social media language. (2015, methodology): “Funder’s Realistic Accuracy Model (RAM; Funder, 1999, 2012) was developed to explain the accuracy of trait T h i s do c u m e n t i s c opy r i gh t e d by t h e A m e r i ca n P s y c ho l og i ca l A ss o c i a ti on o r on e o f it s a lli e d pub li s h e r s .”