The NEO–PI–3: A More Readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory

By R. McCrae, Paul T. Costa, Jr., Thomas A. Martin. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2005

685 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de629a5455715009dc5298f3f38e04a697477234

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. L. Clark
2. J. Block
3. D. Watson
4. Jonathan W. Schooler

In Clinical Psychology

1. L. Clark
2. D. Watson
3. J. Block
4. Colin G. DeYoung
5. T. Widiger
6. Robert Krueger
7. Kristian E. Markon
8. Christopher J. Hopwood

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. L. Clark
2. J. Block
3. D. Watson
4. Jonathan W. Schooler
5. Madeleine E. Gross
6. Claire M. Zedelius
7. Colin G. DeYoung
8. J. Smallwood

Citations in the corpus

• The Five-Factor Framing of Personality and Beyond: Some Ruminations (2010, background): “In the intervening years, the proprietary NEO–PIR has not been subject to further change beyond some psychometric tunings within a few of its a priori facet scales, resulting in the issuing of a modestly improved NEO–PI–3 ( McCrae, Costa, & Martin, 2005 ).”
• Sex differences and sex similarities in disgust sensitivity (2011, neutral): “In Study 2, we examine TDDS construct equivalence across the sexes in a different manner: we test for sex differences in concurrent validity of the TDDS using a revision of the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-3; Costa & Mccrea, 1992; McCrae, Costa, & tin, 2005).”
• Cultivating an understanding of curiosity as a seed for creativity (2020, background): “Most measures of Openness have subdimensions that map onto curiosity; the NEO PI–3 ideas dimension [26], the BFAS intellect dimension [27], Woo’s curiosity dimension [28], and the HEXACO inquisitiveness dimension [29].”
• Constructing Validity: New Developments in Creating Objective Measuring Instruments (2019, background): “The authors first presented convergent and discriminant validity analyses to establish that some scales assessed the same trait dimensions as scales in the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3; McCrae, Costa, & Martin, 2005), whereas others did not.”
• Psilocybin-assisted treatment for alcohol dependence: A proof-of-concept study (2015, neutral): “, 2006), the ASPIRES Spiritual Transcendence Scale (Piedmont, 1999), the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality (Fetzer Institute, 1999), the NEO Personality Inventory 3 (NEO-PI-3) (Mccrae et al., 2005), and the Schwartz Value Survey (Schwartz, 1992, 2006).”