Listeners as co-narrators.

By Janet Beavin Bavelas, Linda Coates, Trudy Johnson. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000

683 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0fabf5ebff05a958bdf720eddd1a950335e08a67

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress. (2007, background): “Research by Bavelas, Coates, and Johnson (2000, 2002) has emphasized the importance of attentive, active listening for successful communication.”
Enhanced accuracy of mental state decoding in dysphoric college students (2005, background): “In everyday conversations, people exhibit brief expressions or reactions that reflect fleeting emotional/intentional states (e.g., a slight furrowing of the brow or raising of an eyebrow) ( Bavelas, Coates, & Johnson, 2000 ).”
The Listener as Addressee in Face-to-Face Dialogue (2011, methodology): “Before conducting the two experiments just described (Bavelas et al., 2000), we watched many videos of storytelling similar to the Sleeper story.”
Listener Responses as a Collaborative Process: The Role of Gaze (2002, background): “Bavelas, Coates, and Johnson (2000) have applied these two principles (integrated messages and collaboration) to highly asymmetrical dialogues, in which one person did virtually all of the speaking and the other was ostensibly only a listener: One stranger told a personal close-call story to anothe”
Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation (2008, background): “…Schegloff, 1982).1 Although M. H. Goodwin (1980) and Jefferson (1983) have discussed the former as “acknowledgments,” Schegloff (1982) as “continuers,” and Bavelas et al. (2000) as “generic responses,” there is general agreement among these researchers that mm hm, uh huh yeah, and nods form a…”
Creating Rapport with Virtual Agents (2007, background): “Such feedback has been called envelope feedback [26] or generic feedback [27] and, despite being non-specific to the meaning of speech, plays an important interaction function.”
Addressee backchannels steer narrative development (2014, background): “This may have led to the repetitions and awkward justifications observed by Bavelas et al. (2000).”
Mere listening effect on creativity and the mediating role of psychological safety. (2018, result): “This may be in line with previous results, where inattentive listeners were found to undermine speakers attempts for self verification (Pasupathi & Rich, 2005) and tended to ignore the meaning of the speakers’ stories (Bavelas et al., 2000).”
How do forward models work? And why would you want them? (2013, neutral): “, Bock & Levelt 1994; Dell 1986; Garrett 1980; Hartsuiker & Kolk, 2001; Levelt 1989; Levelt et al. 1999) make no reference to forward modeling, and instead debate the operations of the production implementer (see top line in Fig. 4). They tend to assume that self-monitoring uses the comprehension sy”
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue (2004, background): “These presentational phases are not monologues, as even minimal feedback affects them considerably (Bavelas et al. 2000).”
We Remember, We Forget: Collaborative Remembering in Older Couples (2011, background): “253)—that is, in collectives such as couples, families, friends, and work teams, remembering is an interactive activity where memories are dynamically and jointly constructed in conversation ( Barnier et al, 2008 ; Bavelas, Coates, & Johnson, 2000 ; Campbell, 2003 ; Middleton & Brown, 2005 ; Tol”
Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. (2008, background): “However, there is experimental evidence (Beattie & Aboudan, 1994; Bavelas, Coates, & Johnson, 2000 ) that a physi-Table 2 Ten unique features of spontaneous face-to-face conversations”