Listener Responses as a Collaborative Process: The Role of Gaze

By Janet Beavin Bavelas, Linda Coates, Trudy Johnson. 2002

480 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45c842da3c9115f38c9cd5243bb43279ae6dd6e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Addressee backchannels steer narrative development (2014, background): “…research has also been conducted with the goal of providing an analysis of what cues within the speaker’s talk -- whether prosodic, syntactic, or embodied -- act as invitations for the addressee to provide a backchannel (see e.g. Koiso et al., 1998; Morency et al., 2010; Bavelas et al., 2002).”
The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress. (2007, background): “Research by Bavelas, Coates, and Johnson (2000, 2002) has emphasized the importance of attentive, active listening for successful communication.”
Gaze Direction Signals Response Preference in Conversation (2017, background): “…analysis, however, the regulatory function of gaze became a central part of the cue-based model of turn taking developed by Duncan et al. (Duncan, 1972; Duncan, Brunner, & Fiske, 1979; Duncan & Fiske, 1977) and continues to garner attention (e.g., Bavelas et al., 2002; Ho et al., 2015).”
Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation (2009, background): “This is incidentally not the expectation in the literature, where addressee gaze rather than speaker gaze has been argued to be the norm (4, 6, 39).”
What speakers do and what addressees look at: visual attention to gestures in human interaction live and on video (2006, unknown): “In particular, addressees look more intently and continuously at the speaker's face than vice versa (e.g. Argyle and Cook 1976; Argyle and Graham 1976; Bavelas, Coates and Johnson 2002; Kendon 1967; 1973; 1990; Rutter 1984).”
Langauge and Violence: Analysis of Four Discursive Operations (2007, background): “Like other forms of social conduct (Bavelas et al. 2002; Brenneis and Lein 1977; Coates and Johnson 2001; Goodwin 1981; Kendon 1985; Kraut and Johnston 1979; Linell 1982, 1988; Rosenthal 1982), violent behavior is most accurately understood when it is examined in context, that is, when we consider b”
Embodiment and sense-making in autism (2013, background): “For instance, listeners coordinate their movements, however small, with the changes in speed, direction and intonation of the movements and utterances of the speaker (Bavelas et al., 2002).”
Gaze as Social Control: How Very Young Children Differentiate "The Look" From a "Mere Look" by Their Adult Caregivers (2005, background): “Bavelas, Coates, and Johnson (2002) have noted that when speakers look to a listener during the production of a narrative, listeners typically issue a response token such as “mhm” or a nod.”
The Listener as Addressee in Face-to-Face Dialogue (2011, background): “Once we started studying what addressees do in dialogue, we became curious about the timing of their responses ( Bavelas, Coates, & Johnson, 2002 ).”