Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition Contributes to Drug Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer

By Thiruvengadam Arumugam, V. Ramachandran, K. Fournier, Huamin Wang, L. Marquis, J. Abbruzzese, G. Gallick, C. Logsdon, D. McConkey, W. Choi. Cancer Research, 2009

864 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A better understanding of drug resistance mechanisms is required to improve outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer. Here we characterized patterns of sensitivity and resistance to three conventional chemotherapeutic agents with divergent mechanisms of action (gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin) in pancreatic cancer cells. Four (L3.6pl, BxPC-3, CFPAC-1, SU86.86) were sensitive and five (PANC-1, Hs766T, AsPC-1, MIAPaCa-2, Mpanc96) were resistant to all 3 agents based on GI50 (50% growth inhibition). Gene expression profiling and unsupervised hierarchical clustering revealed that the sensitive and resistant cells formed two distinct groups and differed in expression of specific genes including several features of “epithelial-mesenchymal transition” (EMT). Interestingly, an inverse correlation between E-cadherin and its transcriptional suppressor, Zeb-1 was observed in the gene expression data and was confirmed by real time PCR. Independent validation experiment using 5 new pancreatic cancer cell lines confirmed that an inverse correlation between E-cadherin and Zeb-1 correlated closely with resistance to gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin. Silencing Zeb-1 in the mesenchymal lines not only increased the expression of E-cadherin but also other epithelial markers such as EVA1 and MAL2 and restored drug sensitivity. Importantly, immunohistochemical analysis of E-cadherin and Zeb-1 in primary tumors confirmed that expression of the two proteins was mutually exclusive (p=0.012). Therefore, our results suggest that Zeb-1 and other regulators of EMT may maintain drug resistance in human pancreatic cancer cells, and therapeutic strategies to inhibit Zeb-1 and reverse EMT should be evaluated.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Oncology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f4dab9ae085a3d22bc7db5d1ad1298ed9c30bc8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. J. Shim
  2. Bowen Du
  3. Matthew D. Hall
  4. Lynn M. Pouliot
  5. D. Shen
  6. Simone Brabletz
  7. Wei Dang Lu
  8. Michael M. Gottesman

In Oncology

  1. J. Shim
  2. Bowen Du
  3. Matthew D. Hall
  4. Lynn M. Pouliot
  5. D. Shen
  6. Wei Dang Lu
  7. Michael M. Gottesman
  8. Simone Brabletz

Citations in the corpus