Stigma Consciousness in Intergroup Contexts: The Power of Conviction

By Elizabeth C. Pinel. 2002

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ea76516d6f0b1ea78de92964770348678433de9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Prejudice and Discrimination as Social Stressors (2007, background): “This research has shown that expectations of stigma can impair social and academic functioning of stigmatized persons by affecting their performance (Farina et al., 1968; Steele & Aronson, 1995; Steele, 1997; Crocker et al., 1998; Pinel, 2002 ).”
A paradox of support seeking and rejection among the stigmatized (2008, background): “Third, the paradox of indirect seeking supports prior social psychological work on self-fulfilling prophecies (e.g., Jussim et al., 2000) and stigma perceptions and self-defeating behaviors (Pinel, 2002).”
The social psychology of stigma. (2005, background): “…women high in stigma consciousness interacted with a male partner who they had been led to believe was sexist, they rated him especially critically; their ratings elicited negative evaluations from the male partner, in turn confirming the women’s belief that they would not like him (Pinel 2002).”
Stereotype threat as a barrier to women entering engineering careers (2017, methodology): “Subsequent analysis supported women scoring high on the SCQ were more susceptible to stereotype threat (Brown & Pinel, 2003), anticipate interactions with males to be sexist (Pinel, 2002), and are more likely to attribute performance feedback to discrimination (Pinel, 2004).”
Threatened identities and interethnic interactions (2006, background): “This was evident in a situation in which women who were either high or low in stigma consciousness (i.e., dispositionally prone to expect to be the target of prejudice) worked with male interaction partners on a task where they decided on a winner for a journalism prize (Pinel, 2002).”
Imagining intergroup contact promotes projection to outgroups (2008, background): “2001), experiencing more anxiety (Plant & Devine, 2003) and evaluating the outgroup less favorably (Pinel, 2002).”
Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. (2003, background): “Evidence from current studies of youth has confirmed that the purported shifts in the social environment have so far failed to protect LGB youth from prejudice and discrimination and its harmful impact (Safe Schools Coalition of Washington, 1999).”
Understanding Racial Differences on Cognitive Ability Tests in Selection Contexts: An Integration of Stereotype Threat and Applicant Reactions Research (2003, background): “Likewise, it is possible that stereotype threat could also influence on the job behavior and work performance (cf. Pinel, 1999, 2002).”
Interpersonal Concerns in Social Encounters between Majority and Minority Group Members (2003, background): “Moreover, in actual intergroup interactions these individuals are more likely to treat their partner negatively, which elicits negative evaluations from their partner (Pinel, 2002).”
The Effects of Stereotypes on the Achievement Gap: Reexamining the Academic Performance of African American High School Students (2008, background): “Pinel (1999, 2002) has suggested that stigma consciousness, “the extent to which a person expects to be stereotyped by others” (Ployhart, Ziegert, & McFarland, 2003, p. 238), influences reactions that a stereotyped person may have in a number of situations (e.g., interpersonal; test-taking).”
Stigma on my mind: Individual differences in the experience of stereotype threat (2003, background): “Although the antecedents of stigma consciousness are still unclear, Pinel (1999, 2002a, 2002b) has documented some of the cognitive and interpersonal consequences associated with stigma consciousness.”
Imagined Intergroup Contact: Theory, Paradigm and Practice (2009, background): “This is likely because minority groups tend to be more suspicious of majorities (Pinel, 2002) and experience more anxiety at the thought of intergroup contact (Plant & Devine, 2003).”