Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions

By L. Rychetnik, M. Frommer, P. Hawe, A. Shiell. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2002

1,037 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e639bcd72a12c8a54f5825151d30c2a2b3174d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. K. Nielsen
2. Ross C. Brownson
3. J. Fielding
4. M. Petticrew

In General Health Professions

1. Andrew Booth
2. K. Nielsen
3. Ross C. Brownson
4. M. Petticrew
5. H. Roberts
6. J. Ford
7. R. Randall
8. Caroline Knight

Citations in the corpus

• Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide (2005, background): “This is no longer the case: ‘‘Preparing reviews takes time, effort, intelligence and commitment, and it is a branch of scientific endeavour as important as primary research’’.(53)”
• Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. (2009, background): “Although numerous authors have written about the role of context in informing evidence-based practice (32, 60, 77, 90, 92, 93, 140, 141), there is little consensus on its definition.”
• Review Article: How can we make organizational interventions work? Employees and line managers as actively crafting interventions (2013, methodology): “It has therefore been argued that the RCT design should be supplemented by methods that allow researchers to answer questions such as how and why organizational interventions work for whom under which circumstances (Oakley et al., 2006; Pawson and Tilley, 1997; Rychetnik et al., 2002; Semmer, 2011)?”
• How to Track Adaptation to Climate Change: A Typology of Approaches for National-Level Application (2013, background): “…which prioritize measurable “hard” interventions with readily visible impact, downplaying “softer” adaptations which may be more likely to be effective in reducing vulnerability (Campbell et al. 2000, Laville 2000, Rychetnik et al. 2002, Adger et al. 2005, Preston et al. 2009, Sovacool 2011).”
• Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework (2017, background): “Moreover, the boundaries between what constitutes the intervention, its implementation and context are often blurred [2, 4], with interactions taking place between all three [5].”