Using and validating the strategic alignment model

By David E. Avison, Jill Jones, Philip L. Powell, David N. Wilson. Journal of strategic information systems, 2004

704 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Strategic IT alignment: twenty-five years on (2015, background): “Success depends upon an innovation ecosystem that comprises several partners in multi-organizational relationships to develop new products, services, and processes (Adner, 2012).”
Research Commentary - Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango (2010, background): “Even studies of strategic alignment (e.g., Avison et al. 2004) that examine the alignment among clusters of such variables do not take a holistic view.”
An Exploratory Study into IT Governance Implementations and its Impact on Business/IT Alignment (2009, result): “Other researchers have complemented this model with additional insights (e.g., Avison et al., 2004; Feuer et al., 2000, Maes, 1999) and have offered more specific business/IT alignment definitions such as “the degree to which the information technology mission, objectives and plans support and are…”
IT alignment: what have we learned? (2007, methodology): “The SAM model has received empirical support and has conceptual and practical value (Goedvolk et al ., 1997; Avison et al ., 2004).”