Science parks in Sweden – industrial renewal and development?

By Hans Löfsten, Peter Lindelöf. 2001

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0dea92f767a1959531628b646f000438d6eee158

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Explaining incubators using firm analogy (2009, background): “In other words, an incubator is an environment for initiation and growth of these firms (Aerts et al., 2007; Chan and Lau, 2005; Löfsten and Lindelöf, 2001; Lindelöf, 2002; Mian, 1994).”
Science Park Location and New Technology-Based Firms in Sweden – Implications for Strategy and Performance (2003, methodology): “analysis of the empirical and theoretical basis for Science Parks, drawing on current understanding of the innovation process and the relationship between academic research and industrial activity, suggests that the Science Park model itself is problematic (Löfsten and Lindelöf, 2001).”
Knowledge flow in Technological Business Incubators: Evidence from Australia and Israel (2015, background): “Lofsten and Lindelof (2001) suggest that entrepreneurial firms located in incubators are more likely to have relationship with universities than other entrepreneurial firms.”
Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems (2014, background): “…to be localised in geographical hotspots, usually centered around leading universities and public research organisations (Link and Scott, 2003; Van der Borgh et al., 2012; van Looy et al., 2003; Löfsten and Lindelöf, 2001; Pouder and St. John, 1996; Saxenian, 1996; 2006; Zucker and Darby, 2001).”
Knowledge spillovers in science and technology parks: how can firms benefit most? (2015, background): “Previous studies have also found no significant benefits of belonging to a park on firms’ innovative capacity (Westhead 1997) or on performance (Bakouros et al. 2002; Dettwiler et al. 2006; Ferguson and Olofsson 2004; Löfsten and Lindelöf 2001; Massey et al. 1992).”
Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms : academic-industry links, innovation and markets (2002, background): “Growth must be seen asemployment growthandsales growth(see also the pilot study, Löfsten and Lindelöf, 2001), which leads to increasing resources within the firm.”
S&T Parks and business incubators in middle-sized countries: the case of greece (2007, background): “1 See Colombo and Delmastro (2002), Link (2002), Lofsten and Lindelof (2001, 2002, 2003) , and”