The assessment of anger and hostility: a critical review

By C. Eckhardt, Bradley Norlander, J. Deffenbacher. 2004

325 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0db3b39b19d4d7e6ff298850e5ac25df216c1d33

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Clair F. Cassiello-Robbins
2. David H. Barlow
3. R. Novaco
4. Dianna T. Kenny
5. M. Osborne

In Social Psychology

1. Clair F. Cassiello-Robbins
2. David H. Barlow
3. R. Novaco
4. Dianna T. Kenny
5. Bilal Afsar
6. Maryam Rehman
7. M. Osborne

Citations in the corpus

• Women, Anger, and Aggression (2008, unknown): “Similarly, Eckhardt et al. (2002) advocate that researchers move beyond these traditional endorsement measures in the attempt to better capture the anger experience.”
• Anger: The Unrecognized Emotion in Emotional Disorders (2016, background): “A difficulty that arises in the assessment of anger (whether it be self-report or clinician-rated) is that patients often deny the intensity and frequency of their anger experiences (Lipkus & Barefoot, 1994).”
• A quantitative review of the relationship between anger and aggressive driving (2007, background): “A related construct is that of hostility, also thought to be multidimensional in nature and composed of negative cognitions and emotions (Eckhardt et al., 2004).1 It is possible that measures of hostility (e.g., the Buss–Durkee Hostility Scale; developed by Buss & Durkee, 1957) and trait anger…”
• Anger and Psychopathology (2010, background): “There are many psychometric instruments for the assessment of anger and hostility, and the review by Eckhardt, Norlander, and Deffenbacher (2004) provides valuable coverage.”