Technology Frames and Framing: A Socio-Cognitive Investigation of Requirements Determination

411 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

When Does Technology Use Enable Network Change in Organizations? A Comparative Study of Feature Use and Shared Affordances (2013, background): “This finding highlights the importance of attending to the creation of frames about technology use (e.g., Davidson 2002, 2006).”
Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality (2013, background): “…a critique of agential realism, it does so not because I believe that the theoretical foundation of agential realism is in any way inferior to the theoretical foundation of critical realism, but because the genre of critique allows me to most efficiently showcase their differences and the…”
Collaborating on Multiparty Information Systems Development Projects: A Collective Reflection-in-Action View (2005, background): “Project participants also have different world views that lead to difficulties in mutual understanding (Davidson 2002, Orlikowski and Gash 1994, Wastell 1999).”
Managing technological change in the digital age: the role of architectural frames (2014, background): “Modularity serves as a technological frame-of-reference (Orlikowski and Gash, 1994; Davidson, 2002; Kaplan and Tripsas, 2008) that fosters a ‘built-up repertoire of tacit knowledge’ (Gioia, 1986: 56) for managing technological change when the key source of value creation is economics of scale.”