Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data
By S. Downing. Medical Education, 2003
1,396 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Family Practice, Management Science and Operations Research, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ca7c8f0492bffa4719eb97b0149264d10e9b759
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Family Practice
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- Discrepancies between school grades and test scores at individual and school level: effects of gender and family background (2008, background): “In order to justify interpretation and the use of scores (scores in a broad sense, both qualitative and quantitative summaries, where grades may be seen as a quantitative summary), multiple sources of evidence provide a framework for the validation of assessment where each source of evidence (conten”
- Patient-reported outcomes: A new era in clinical research (2011, background): “[3] It is a necessary (but not adequate) component of validity.[27,28] To establish the reliability of the scores before using the PROinstrument in practice, it is necessary that there should be sufficient accrual of evidence.”
- Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: a systematic review. (2009, methodology): “Deming management method (adapted)36 Emergency medicine Communication, counseling (16) Scale (1-3) with adjective anchors No Yes Cronbach Concurrent validity No”