Do people fake on personality inventories? A verbal protocol analysis

By C. Robie, Douglas J. Brown, James C. Beaty. 2007

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8320ac66c9ee924f86c20179645519a536e1d81

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Kevin J. Murphy
2. Neal Schmitt
3. F. Morgeson

In Clinical Psychology

1. Neal Schmitt
2. M. Campion
3. Kevin J. Murphy
4. J. Hollenbeck
5. F. Morgeson
6. R. L. Dipboye
7. T. Judge
8. Reeshad S. Dalal

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Campion
2. Kevin J. Murphy
3. Neal Schmitt
4. J. Hollenbeck
5. F. Morgeson
6. R. L. Dipboye

Citations in the corpus

• ARE WE GETTING FOOLED AGAIN? COMING TO TERMS WITH LIMITATIONS IN THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS FOR PERSONNEL SELECTION (2007, background): “With a few exceptions (Fiske, 1968; Robie, Brown, & Beaty, 2007 ), this advice seems to have been ignored in favor of a black box, psychometric approach.”