Attributions to Discrimination and Self-Esteem: The Role of Group Identification and Appraisals

By Collette P. Eccleston, B. Major. 2006

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0aada41303f8814c82f4da144dea4439a39a5ca4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. N. Ellemers
2. M. Verkuyten
3. B. Derks
4. C. van Laar
5. C. Ward
6. J. Hunt
7. D. Quinn
8. Brian E Armenta

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Verkuyten
2. J. Thijs
3. N. Ellemers
4. B. Derks
5. J. Hunt
6. C. van Laar
7. Stephenie R. Chaudoir
8. C. Ward

Citations in the corpus

• Identity, Perceived Religious Discrimination, and Psychological Well‐Being in Muslim Immigrant Women (2012, background): “…in nature with perceived discrimination seen as strengthening ethno-cultural identity (Branscombe, Schmitt, & Harvey, 1999; Verkuyten & Nekuee, 1999), and a strong ethnocultural identity in turn increasing the inclination to label ambiguous situations as discriminatory (Eccleston & Major, 2006).”
• Living with a concealable stigmatized identity: the impact of anticipated stigma, centrality, salience, and cultural stigma on psychological distress and health. (2009, background): “…well as some additional work done with African Americans, has shown either a negative or null relationship between centrality—also called identity importance or group identification—and psychological well-being (e.g., Eccleston & Major, 2006; Major, Quinton, & Schmader, 2003; McCoy & Major, 2003).”
• The Effects of Police Violence on Inner-City Students* (2020, unknown): “, 2000) to reduced self-esteem (Eccleston and Major, 2006; Schmitt et al., 2014) and self-control (Inzlicht et al.”
• Harga-diri (Self-esteem)Terancam dan Perilaku Menghindar (2015, background): “Penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya ten- tang harga diri (self-esteem) dikaitkan dengan prasangka dalam model transaksional (Major, McCoy, & Kaiser, 2003), dengan atribusi terhadap diskriminasi (Eccleston & Major, 2006; Major dkk., 2003), dan kegagalan regulasi diri (Lambird & Mann, 2007).”
• The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women (2016, background): “…which women's psychological well-being can benefit from identifying with other women, as identification provides a buffer against the negative effects of perceiving gender discrimination (Branscombe, Schmitt, & Harvey, 1999; Eccleston & Major, 2006; Schmitt, Branscombe, Kobrynowicz, & Owen, 2002).”
• Intergroup Contact and Ingroup Reappraisal: Examining the Deprovincialization Thesis (2010, background): “The ‘‘group identity reaction’’ model (Eccleston and Major 2006) postulates that perceiving group threat leads individuals to identify more strongly with their ingroup and to evaluate their ingroup more positively.”
• Support for Multiculturalism and Minority Rights: The Role of National Identification and Out-group Threat (2009, methodology): “Three different models of this process are tested: the ‘group identity lens model,’ the ‘group identity reaction model,’ and the ‘group identity moderator model’ ( Eccleston & Major, 2006 ).”
• Responding to Societal Devaluation: Effects of Perceived Personal and Group Discrimination on the Ethnic Group Identification and Personal Self-Esteem of Latino/Latina Adolescents (2009, background): “Overall, the participants positively identified with their ethnic group (M = 5.01) and had generally favorable personal self-esteem (M = 3.90), both of which are common among adolescent Latino samples (e.g. Eccleston & Major, 2006; UmañaTaylor & Updegraff, 2007).”