Intergroup Contact and Ingroup Reappraisal: Examining the Deprovincialization Thesis

By M. Verkuyten, J. Thijs, Hidde Bekhuis. 2010

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92b24b4cc142614fa8f1b2cbaed0e116bc21ab8f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Yvonni Markaki
2. Simonetta Longhi
3. Linda R. Tropp

In Social Psychology

1. Yvonni Markaki
2. Simonetta Longhi
3. Linda R. Tropp
4. Eric D. Knowles
5. T. Pettigrew
6. Miles Hewstone
7. Nicholas A. Bowman
8. Rhiannon N. Turner

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Yvonni Markaki
2. Simonetta Longhi
3. Linda R. Tropp
4. Eric D. Knowles
5. Miles Hewstone
6. T. Pettigrew
7. Nicholas A. Bowman
8. John F. Dovidio

Citations in the corpus

• What determines attitudes to immigration in European countries? An analysis at the regional level (2013, background): “…status of natives and less segregated neighbourhoods lead to more positive relations (Branton and Jones 2005) while high concentrations of minorities in troubled and poor areas foster feelings of threat and increase conflict (Verkuyten et al. 2010; Vezzali et al. 2010; Vezzali and Giovannini 2011).”
• The Racial and Economic Context of Trump Support (2018, background): “These interactions also tend to lessen group threat and encourage distancing from the in-group (Verkuyten et al., 2010).”