What You Don’t Know Might Hurt You: Some Unresolved Issues in the Design and Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments

By Jordan J. Louviere. 2006

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/094946802e8ce9650aa7161833d42e0b9429f824

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

How Much is Too Much? (2008, background): “On the other hand, Louviere (2004, p. 18) argues that: “It is widely believed that ‘modeling’ individuals requires ‘smallish designs,’ but in contrast to the equivalent of widely held ‘academic urban myths’ in marketing and transport research, there is considerable evidence that humans will ‘do’ d”
Valuing cultural heritage in developing countries: comparing and pooling contingent valuation and choice modelling estimates (2007, background): “…frame of the choice occasion (Harrison 2006; Shogren 2006); designing of choice sets and the structure of choice occasion (Hensher 2006); modelling of preference heterogeneity (Morey et al. 2006; Provencher and Moore 2006); and embracing model uncertainty (Layton and Lee 2006; Louviere 2006).”
The impact of offering two versus three alternatives in choice modelling experiments (2009, unknown): “This means that researchers have to consider decision processes as contributing factors to parameter and variance estimates (Mazzotta and Opaluch, 1995; Breffle and Rowe, 2002; Hensher, 2006; Louviere, 2006).”
The first time is the hardest: A test of ordering effects in choice experiments (2012, background): “The difference in responses between the two sequences is initially examined through a likelihood ratio (LR) test for equality of all model parameters (Swait and Louviere 1993). This test involves Models (i) - (iii). Comparing the pooled model in (iii) with the two separate models (i) and (ii), the l”
The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments (2010, background): “Rather than generating more complex, statistically-fitting choice models, some authors have argued for developing a better behavioral theory guiding both model specification and empirical research (Louviere, 2006).”
What’s in a name? The use of quantitative measures versus ‘Iconised’ species when valuing biodiversity (2008, methodology): “Recent advances in the use of Mixed Logit models (Hensher and Greene 2003) and the latent-class models are relevant tools of analysis to this end (Boxall and Adamowicz 2002; Greene and Hensher 2003; Scarpa and Thiene 2005; Morey et al. 2006, Louviere 2006 ).”