Moral Unreason: The Case of Psychopathy
By H. Maibom. 2005
93 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09036987ab2c258b7851c55cce9ae682c86bfaf5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Successful Psychopaths: Are They Unethical Decision-Makers and Why? (2012, background): “As some have argued, psychopaths offer interesting tests of moral theory as subjects without empathic concerns or remorse (Maibom 2005), and they have lead to important insights in the relative roles of emotion and cognition in various aspects of moral thinking (Glenn et al.”
- The Mad, the Bad, and the Psychopath (2008, methodology): “been argued by Jeanette Kennett [40] and myself [ 46 ].”
- The dark side of management decisions: organisational psychopaths (2006, background): “They are more motivated (Boddy, 2005b) because they crave the power, money and prestige that go with senior managerial positions and they are better equipped because they lack empathy (Maibom, 2005; Chapman et al., 2003) and are ruthless, prepared to lie, have fewer other claims on their time becaus”