PREY STATE AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AFFECT RELATIVE SIZE OF TRAIT- AND DENSITY-MEDIATED INDIRECT EFFECTS

By Barney Luttbeg, L. Rowe, Marc Mangel. 2003

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08b83bf0f7eadb736d266c8c0912d94bdc4e4224

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Aaron J. Wirsing
2. Michael R. Heithaus
3. W. Cresswell
4. Boris Worm
5. J. Linnell
6. A. Frid
7. Jonathan H. Grabowski
8. F. Valladares

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. W. Cresswell
2. Aaron J. Wirsing
3. Michael R. Heithaus
4. F. Valladares
5. D. Bolnick
6. E. Preisser
7. Ernesto Gianoli
8. Michael F. Benard

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Aaron J. Wirsing
2. Michael R. Heithaus
3. W. Cresswell
4. F. Valladares
5. D. Bolnick
6. E. Preisser
7. A. Frid
8. Ernesto Gianoli

Citations in the corpus

• SCARED TO DEATH? THE EFFECTS OF INTIMIDATION AND CONSUMPTION IN PREDATOR–PREY INTERACTIONS (2005, background): “We did this because the importance of TM effects in a predator–prey interaction may depend on environmental conditions (Luttbeg et al. 2003).”
• Predation in bird populations (2011, background): “When starvation risk is high during the long, cold nights and short days of winter most small birds put on fat reserves (e.g. MacLeod et al. 2005; Macleod et al. 2008) and adopt foraging areas and tactics that maximise their daily energy intake (e.g. van der Veen 2000; Duriez et al. 2005).”
• Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity. (2007, background): “Ecologists are starting to recognize the importance of traitmediated interactions (TMI), namely the effects that occur on the interacting organisms as a consequence of changes in their phenotypes (Bolker et al., 2003; Dill et al., 2003; Luttbeg et al., 2003; Trussell et al., 2003; Werner & Peacor, 2”
• PREDATOR-AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR EXTENDS TROPHIC CASCADES TO REFUGE HABITATS (2005, background): “Animal behavior can also influence interactions among competitors or predators and their prey, and subsequently affect the strength of trophic cascades (Luttbeg et al. 2003, Werner and Peacor 2003).”
• Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declines. (2008, background): “Here, behaviorally mediated indirect interactions are expected to dominate top predator effects [66, 68 ].”
• CONNECTING THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL STUDIES OF TRAIT‐MEDIATED INTERACTIONS (2003, methodology): “…change or gradual learning (Abrams 1992a, 1999, Houston et al. 1993, Abrams and Rowe 1996, Abrams and Matsuda 1997) or it can be derived from a full dy- S pe c ia l Fe at u r e namic optimization model (Werner and Anholt 1993, Crowley and Hopper 1994, Luttbeg and Schmitz 2000, Luttbeg et al. 2003).”
• RESOURCE COMPETITION MODIFIES THE STRENGTH OF TRAIT- MEDIATED PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS: A META-ANALYSIS (2005, background): “A number of models predict that prey will forage less (take fewer risks) as resources become more abundant (e.g., McNamara and Houston 1987, Mangel and Clark 1988, Ludwig and Rowe 1990, Werner and Anholt 1993, Luttbeg et al. 2003).”
• Habitat heterogeneity and mammalian predator–prey interactions (2012, background): “Spatial heterogeneity may affect prey vulnerability, and therefore determine the relative importance of these induced behavioural responses on predator–prey interactions (Luttbeg et al. 2003).”