Habitat heterogeneity and mammalian predator–prey interactions
By Lucrezia Gorini, J. Linnell, R. May, Manuela Panzacchi, L. Boitani, Morten Odden, E. Nilsen. 2012
175 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d226235f8781eb5247957ad544e5e8ad82ccde77
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Predation or scavenging? Prey body condition influences decision‐making in a facultative predator, the wolverine (2016, background): “Periods with temporarily vulnerable prey populations, such as neonates or heavily pregnant females, can be beneficial for many carnivores (Molinari- Jobin et al. 2004, Owen- Smith 2008, Gorini et al. 2012), but are especially crucial for cursorial predators and less efficient hunters.”
- Spatial and Temporal Structure of a Mesocarnivore Guild in Midwestern North America (2015, background): “…has Lesmeister et al. • Factors Influencing Carnivore Guild Structure 55 been repeatedly observed for coyotes and may enhance this highly mobile predator’s success of cursorial hunting (Van Valkenburgh 1985, Bradley and Fagre 1988, Tigas et al. 2002, Thibault and Ouellet 2005, Gorini et al. 2012).”
- Large carnivore expansion in Europe is associated with human population density and land cover changes (2021, background): “Because landscape composition and configuration may influence large carnivores' spatial ecology and predator–prey dynamics, thus influencing predator habitat selection (Gorini et al., 2012), we also considered the diversity, interspersion and cohesion of land cover types (McGarigal et al., 2012).”