CONNECTING THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL STUDIES OF TRAIT‐MEDIATED INTERACTIONS

By Benjamin M. Bolker, M. Holyoak, Vlastimil Krivan, L. Rowe, Oswald J. Schmitz. 2003

373 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af890bdc7aa8add3aa721d096931ecabc027e463

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. W. Cresswell
2. D. Christianson
3. S. Creel
4. S. Peacor
5. D. Bolnick
6. E. Preisser
7. F. Valladares
8. Andrew Sih

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. W. Cresswell
2. F. Valladares
3. T. Ohgushi
4. D. Bolnick
5. E. Preisser
6. P. Abrams
7. S. Peacor
8. D. Christianson

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. F. Valladares
2. W. Cresswell
3. T. Ohgushi
4. Andrew Sih
5. R. Callaway
6. D. Bolnick
7. E. Preisser
8. P. Abrams

Citations in the corpus

• A REVIEW OF TRAIT-MEDIATED INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES (2003, background): “Prey switching by predators has been well documented, but typically has not been identified with the larger conceptual issue of TMIIs (see Bolker et al. 2003).”
• Consequences of behavioral dynamics for the population dynamics of predator-prey systems with switching (2004, background): “It is known that adaptive changes in foraging behaviors can have large consequences for interactions between species, and can lead to a bewildering variety of indirect effects (Werner and Anholt 1993; Abrams et al. 1996; Peacor and Werner 1997; Bolker et al. 2003; Werner and Peacor 2003).”
• Phenotypic modifications to conspecific density arising from predation risk assessment (2003, neutral): “…increasing attention from ecologists (Turner and Mittelbach 1990, Huang and Sih 1991, McIntosh and Townsend 1996, Beckerman et al. 1997, Peacor and Werner 1997, Turner 1997, Peckarsky and McIntosh 1998, Relyea 2000, Abrams et al. 1996, reviewed in Werner and Peacor 2003, and Bolker et al. 2003).”
• Indirect Interaction Webs: Herbivore-Induced Effects Through Trait Change in Plants (2005, background): “More recently, some authors have stressed the community consequences of trait-mediated indirect interactions in herbivore–predator systems (Werner & Peacor 2003, Bolker et al. 2003).”
• Predator-prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions (2010, background): “Note that most standard ecological theory ignores NCEs (but see Abrams 1995, Bolker et al. 2003, Preisser and Bolnick 2008).”
• Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity. (2007, background): “Ecologists are starting to recognize the importance of traitmediated interactions (TMI), namely the effects that occur on the interacting organisms as a consequence of changes in their phenotypes (Bolker et al., 2003; Dill et al., 2003; Luttbeg et al., 2003; Trussell et al., 2003; Werner & Peacor, 2”
• Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. (2008, methodology): “wolf–elk dynamics. The model is a tool to highlight the importance of measuring demographicrisk effects,andultimately incorporating these costs into models of predator–prey dynamics [ 26 ], which has not previously been considered in the models used to evaluate the”
• Predation in bird populations (2011, background): “The relative strength of non-lethal effects, their predominance in determining population and community effects and the decoupling of the number of prey killed and predator abundance from the strength of these effects are very well established concepts in ecological literature (Lima 1998; Agrawal 20”
• PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY AND INTERACTIONS AMONG PLANTS (2003, background): “In particular, (1) it is difficult to separate the effects of plasticity from the confounding effects of the treatments used to create plasticity (Bolker et al. 2003), and (2) it is difficult to assess the consequences of plasticity in a natural setting because of the very S pec ial Featu r e…”
• PREY STATE AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AFFECT RELATIVE SIZE OF TRAIT- AND DENSITY-MEDIATED INDIRECT EFFECTS (2003, background): “A large theoretical literature has demonstrated that TMII can make up a significant proportion of given indirect effects, and may even change the sign of those effects (e.g., Abrams 1991a, 1992, 1995; reviewed in Bolker et al. 2003).”
• The Developmental, Physiological, Neural, and Genetical Causes and Consequences of Frequency-Dependent Selection in the Wild (2006, background): “At the ecosystem level (Figure 6b), fitness surfaces are shaped by interactions among many species [e.g., host-parasite (Ewald 1983), competition, and predatorprey (Bolker et al. 2003), intra- and interspecific brood parasitism (Lyon 2003)].”
• Non-lethal effect of the invasive predator Bythotrephes longimanus on Daphnia mendotae (2006, background): “ectly to affect prey food resources and competitors (reviewed in Abrams, 1995; Bolker et al., 2003; Werner & Peacor, 2003; Schmitz et al., 2004) via trait-mediated indirect interactions, further contributing to the net”