SCARED TO DEATH? THE EFFECTS OF INTIMIDATION AND CONSUMPTION IN PREDATOR–PREY INTERACTIONS
By E. Preisser, D. Bolnick, Michael F. Benard. 2005
1,768 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39cefd6f60d3a7f4196f1bb020b36efb5215d8b1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- W. Cresswell
- Aaron J. Wirsing
- Michael R. Heithaus
- S. Peacor
- Andrew Sih
- Lawrence M. Dill
- D. Bolnick
- E. Preisser
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Aaron J. Wirsing
- Michael R. Heithaus
- Lawrence M. Dill
- W. Cresswell
- S. Peacor
- W. Ripple
- A. Agrawal
- R. Stoks
Citations in the corpus
- Diel predator activity drives a dynamic landscape of fear (2017, neutral): “Fear of predation (perceived predation risk) caused by the mere presence of a predator within an ecosystem is increasingly regarded as an ecological force that rivals or exceeds that of direct killing (Preisser et al. 2005).”
- Predation in bird populations (2011, background): “Costs arise from behaviours that enhance short term survival in the presence of the predator, but that decrease long term fitness, such as body condition or reproductive potential (see Preisser et al. 2005).”
- Altered activity patterns and reduced abundance of native mammals in sites with feral dogs in the high Andes (2016, background): “Fear induced by predators may reduce fitness of prey by altering their activity patterns and habitat use, increasing vigilance time, reducing foraging time, and lowering mating success (Creel and Christianson 2008; Preisser et al. 2005).”
- Linking Behavior to Vital Rates to Measure the Effects of Non‐Lethal Disturbance on Wildlife (2015, background): “However, a growing number of studies have shown that non-lethal effects can have similar, or even larger, influence on populations than direct mortality (Preisser et al. 2005; Creel et al. 2007).”
- Landscapes of Fear: Spatial Patterns of Risk Perception and Response. (2019, background): “Mesocosm experiments have demonstrated that in some contexts, these risk effects of predation have a greater influence on prey population dynamics than the consumptive effects [84].”
- Ecological implications of behavioural syndromes. (2012, background): “costs of avoiding predators) can be as or more important than CEs (Preisser et al. 2005).”
- Population impacts of free‐ranging domestic cats on mainland vertebrates (2017, background): “However, the specter of predation can also create a “landscape of fear” that indirectly affects survival and reproduction by altering prey stress responses and foraging, movement, and/or defense behaviors (Preisser et al. 2005).”