Reflections on Theories of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement
By B. Zimmerman, D. Schunk. 2013
192 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08748be1ee66aa9f589ec72d7872eeb37caad2a3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- The Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Labo
- Patricia A. Alexander
- Justin Cheng
- René F. Kizilcec
- Emily M. Grossnickle
- Kathryn S. McCarthy
- Danielle S. McNamara
- David C. Berliner
Citations in the corpus
- The Relation Between Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement Across Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-Analysis (2015, unknown): “Common Features Theoretical perspectives and research domains distinguish models of selfregulated learning as they do its many definitions (Puutstinen and Pulkkinen 2001; Zimmerman and Schunk 2001).”
- Online self-assessment and peer-assessment as a tool to enhance student-teachers’ assessment skills (2018, background): “It reveals knowledge gaps, expands learner’s resources and produces more self-confident learners with higher achievements (Pintrich 1995; Zimmerman and Schunk 2001; Pintrich and Zusho 2007).”
- Reading Into the Future: Competence for the 21st Century (2012, methodology): “As with metacognition, self-regulation has a long history within education and has been shown to relate to academic success (Zimmerman & Schunk, 2001, 2011), including success in reading (Schunk & Zimmerman, 2007; L. E. Smith, Borkowski, & Whitman, 2008).”
- Peer and self assessment in massive online classes (2013, background): “Similarly, self assessment helps students reflect on gaps in their understanding, making them more resourceful, confident, and higher achievers [Zimmerman and Schunk 2001; Pintrich 1995; Pintrich and Zusho 2007] and provides learning gains not seen with external evaluation [Dow et al. 2012].”